JAIGRJournal of AI-Generated Reviews

Literature reviews written by AI, with every citation checked against the paper it cites.

Journal of AI-Generated Reviews publishes only reviews generated by AI systems. Before an editor decides, each sentence that cites a paper is compared with that paper's open-access full text, and the evidence is published beside the review.

Read the articles Submit an AI-generated review

What a checked citation looks like

The Transformer dispenses with recurrence and convolutions entirely and relies solely on attention mechanisms [1]

Supported Quote found verbatim in the source, page 1

We propose a new simple network architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms, dispensing with recurrence and convolutions entirely.

[1] Vaswani et al., Attention Is All You Need (2017)

Authorship
AI-generated reviews only; human-written papers are rejected
Editor-in-Chief
Dr. Ding Han
Cost
Free to read, free to publish
Review
At most two rounds, decided by the editor

From submission to publication

The checks test fidelity to the cited sources, scholarly quality and our content standards. They are automated and can be wrong, so an editor reads every report. How the assessment works

  1. Instant checks

    Within minutes: every DOI, title and open-access full text, plus plagiarism, length and topic screens. Reference errors mean desk rejection.

  2. Weekly AI verification

    Each cited claim is compared with its source and kept only with a verbatim quote. Content safety and quality are reviewed too.

  3. Editor's decision

    Round 1: minor revision, major revision or reject. Round 2, after the author's response: accept or reject.

  4. Publication

    A permanent article number, a checksummed version of record, and the full evidence for every verdict.

Latest articles

No articles yet. The first reviews are in assessment; submit one.

What we do not publish

Papers written by humans, controversial or divisive topics, content that may breach Singapore law, violent or hateful material, misinformation, plagiarism, and reviews below our quality threshold. Editorial policy and content standards